From Propaganda to Private Grief: Rudyard Kipling and World War I
Abstract
Like many of his contemporaries such as Rupert Brooke, Jessie Pope or Ian Hay, at the outbreak of World War I Rudyard Kipling wrote fervently about the need to fight against the “Hun […] at the gate” (“For All We Have and Are”). The ‘Great Imperialist’ collaborated actively with the first official government propaganda organization, Wellington House. As the war progressed, however, the tone of his works changed, most notably after October 1915, when he and his wife were told that their beloved only son John, aged eighteen, was missing, believed dead. This essay will move from Kipling’s pre-1915 jingoistic poems to his short story “The Gardener” (1925). I will show that notwithstanding his extreme patriotism, Kipling gave his private grief a universal dimension, in the hope that “Their Name [would live] Forevermore”.
Bibliografia
Bick, Rosie. 2013. Private Grief and Public Propaganda: An Analysis of the Authorship of Rudyard Kipling during the First World War. The Journal of Publishing Culture, 1.1: 1-8.
Bilsing, Tracy E. 2000. The Process of Manufacture of Rudyard Kipling’s Private Propaganda. War, Literature and the Arts Journal, 12: 74-98.
Birkenhead, Robin. 1978. Rudyard Kipling. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Booth, Edward J. ed. 2011. The Cambridge Companion to Rudyard Kipling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buitenhuis, Peter. 1989. The Great War of Words: Literature as Propaganda 1914-18 and After. London: B. T. Batsford.
Brogan, Hugh. 2014. The Great War and Rudyard Kipling. Jan Montefiore ed. “In Time’s Eye”, Essays on Rudyard Kipling. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 73-90.
Jarrell, Randall. 1980. On preparing to read Kipling. Kipling, Auden & Co., Essays and Reviews 1935-1965. Manchester: Carcanet.
Kendall, Tim ed. 2007. The Oxford Handbook of British and Irish War Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kipling, Rudyard. 1907. Collected Verse. London: Doubleday.
Kipling, Rudyard. 2008. Poesie. A cura di Ornella De Zordo. Milano: Mursia.
Kipling, Rudyard. 2009. Andrew Rutherford ed. War Stories and Poems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marcus, Jane. 1989. Asylums of Antaeus: Women, War and Madness – Is There a Feminist Fetishism? H. Aram Veeser ed. The New Historicism. New York: Routledge, 132-151.
Montefiore, Jan ed. 2014. “In Time’s Eye”, Essays on Rudyard Kipling. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Ruddick, Sarah. 1993. Towards a Feminist Peace Politics. Miriam Cooke & Angela Woolacott eds. Gendering War Talk. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 109-127.
Tompkins, J.M.S. 1959. The Art of Rudyard Kipling. London: Methuen.
Wilson, Angus. 1978. The Strange Ride of Rudyard Kipling: His Life and Works. New York: Viking.
WEBLIOGRAPHY
McGivering, John. 2011. Notes to “For All We Have and Are.” The New Readers’ Guide to the Work of Rudyard Kipling, http://www.kiplingsociety.co.uk/rg_forall1.htm (accessed on 23 November 2015).
Ragen, Brian Abel. 1996. “The Hun is at the Gate”: Rudyard Kipling’s Poetry of the First World War. https://www.brianbaleragen.net/The-Hun-is-at-the-Gate.pdf (accessed on 23 November 2015).
Rumens, Carol. 2008. Poem of the week: “The Children” by Rudyard Kipling. http://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2008/jul/29/poemoftheweekthechildren (accessed on 23 November 2015).