The Uncanny and the Secular in Amitav Ghosh’s The Great Derangement and The Hungry Tide
Abstract
In The Great Derangement, Climate Change and the Unthinkable Amitav Ghosh addresses a series of key questions about the apparent incapacity of the public opinion to envisage the imminent danger of climate change. Ghosh’s answer to the question can hardly be summarized, as it traces a complex parallel genealogy of climate change, imperialism, and capitalism – all of them being rooted in European Enlightenment, like the novel itself. My paper will briefly trace these hints and link them to Ghosh’s most famous eco-novel, The Hungry Tide (2004), where they are equally in apparent, dissolved as they are in aesthetic digressions. Such digressions, it becomes evident after The Great Derangement, should be read as an alternative way of interpreting nature, which calls for alternative ways of thinking and novel writing.
Bibliografia
Aldama, Frederick Luis. 2002. An Interview with Amitav Ghosh. World Literature Today: A Literary Quarterly of the University of Oklahoma, 76, 2: 84-90.
Bauman, Zygmunt. 1998. Globalization: the Human Consequences. Cambridge: Polity Press. Ghosh, Amitav. 1992. In an Antique Land. History in the Guise of a Traveller’s Tale. New York: Vintage.
Ghosh, Amitav. 2004. Folly in the Sundarbans: A Crocodile in the Swamplands, http://Out-lookindia.com (consulted on18/10/2004).
Ghosh, Amitav. 2016. The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.
Giles, Jana María. 2014. Can the Sublime Be Postcolonial? Aesthetics, Politics, and Environment in Amitav Ghosh’s TheHungry Tide. Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry, 1, 2: 223-242.
Guha, Ramachandra. 1989. Radical American Environmentalism and Wilderness Preservation: A Third World Critique. Environmental Ethics, 11, 1: 71-83.
Huttunen, Tuomas. 2009. Ethics, Language, and the Writing of Amitav Ghosh. A Sea for Encounters: Essays towards a Postcolonial Commonwealth. Stella Borg Barthet ed. Amsterdam: Rodopi: 335-348.
Jaising, Shakti. 2015. Fixity amid Flux: Aesthetics and Environmentalism in Amitav Ghosh’s The Hungry Tide. ARIEL: A Review of International English Literature, 46, 4: 63-88.
Jalais, Annu. 2008. Bonbibi: Bridging Worlds. Indian Folklife Serial, 28: 6-8.
Klein, Naomi. 2014. This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. London: Allen Lane.
Luo, Shao-Pin. 2012. Intertextuality in Amitav Ghosh’s The Hungry Tide. History, Narrative, and Testimony in AmitavGhosh’s Fiction, Chitra Sankaran ed. New York: Suny Press, 145-170.
Moretti, Franco. 2001. Il secolo serio. In Il romanzo. La cultura del romanzo. Franco Moretti (a cura di). Torino: Einaudi, 688-725.
Mukherjee, Upamanyu Pablo. 2010. Postcolonial Environments: Nature, Culture and the Contemporary Indian Novel in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nayar, Pramod K. 2010. The Postcolonial Uncanny; The Politics of Dispossession in Amitav Ghosh’s The Hungry Tide.College Literature, 37, 4: 88-119.
Roy, Arundhati. 1999. The Greater Common Good. Bombay: IndiaBook.
Thieme, John. 2016. Postcolonial Literary Geographies. Out of Place. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Vescovi, Alessandro. 2009. Amitav Ghosh in Conversation. ARIEL: A Review of International English Literature, 40, 4:129-141.
Vescovi, Alessandro. 2014. Fear and Ethics in the Sundarbans. Anthropology in Amitav Ghosh’s The Hungry Tide.Governare la paura. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies (July): 141-157.
White, Laura A. 2013. Novel Vision: Seeing the Sunderbans through Amitav Ghosh’s The Hungry Tide. InterdisciplinaryStudies in Literature and Environment, 20, 3: 513-531.