Of Rainbow and Granite: Androgynous Narrative in Virginia Woolf’s Orlando and Ali Smith’s How to Be Both

Autori

Giuseppe De Riso Università di Napoli L'Orientale

Abstract

This article attempts to conduct a comparative analysis between Virginia Woolf’s Orlando (1928) and Ali Smith’s How to Be Both (2014). Specifically, this study posits Smith’s novel as an appropriate successor to Woolf’s work, as it successfully embraces and expresses the ‘androgynous mind’ theorised by Woolf. This is achieved through the removal of temporal boundaries between past and present, the ambivalence of the protagonists’ sexual identity and, most importantly, through a literary paradigm that is able to explore the need for co-participation between authors and readers and the broader interplay between the literary text and other artistic and cultural sources with which it has a necessary dialogical relationship.

Bibliografia

Bloom, Harold. 1973. The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

Coppola, Maria Micaela. 2015. A Whole New Spectrum of Colours New to the Eye: Gender Metamorphoses and Identity Frescoes in Girl Meets Boy and How to Be Both by Ali Smith. Textus. English Studies in Italy, XXVIII, 1: 169-185.

Frye, Northrop. 1970. The Stubborn Structure: Essays on Criticism and Society. London: Routledge.

Fusini, Nadia. Italian Virginia Woolf Society, https://itvws.it/ (consulted on 20/09/2023).

Galloway, Alexander R. 2006. Gaming. Essays on Algorithmic Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

González, Esther Sánchez-Pardo. 2004. What Phantasmagoria the Mind is: Reading Virginia Woolf’s Parody of Gender. Atlantis, 26, 2: 75-86.

Hyman, Stanley Edgar. 1947. The Marxist Criticism of Literature. The Antioch Review, 7, 4: 541-568.

Patterson, Annabel. 1993. Reading between the Lines. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.

Ranger, Holly. 2019. Ali Smith and Ovid. International Journal of the Classical Tradition, 26: 397-416.

Sedgwick, Eve Kozofsky. 2008 [1990]. Epistemology of the Closet: Updated with a New Preface. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Smith, Ali. 2012a. Artful. London: Penguin Books.

Smith, Ali. 2012b. Style vs content? Novelists should approach their art with an eye to what the story asks, https://www.theguardian.com/books/2012/aug/18/ali-smith-novelists-approach-art (consulted on 20/05/2023).

Smith, Ali. 2012c [2005]. The Accidental. London: Penguin Books.

Smith, Ali. 2014a. He looked like the finest man who ever lived, https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/aug/24/ali-smith-the-finest-man-who-ever-lived-palazzo-schifanoia-how-to-be-both (consulted on 20/05/2023).

Smith, Ali. 2014b. How to Be Both. E-book: Penguin UK.

Stolorow, Robert D., George E. Atwood & Bernard Brandchaft. 2004 [1994]. The Intersubjective Perspective. Lanham-Boulder-New York-Toronto-Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Vendler, Helen. 2005. Invisible Listeners: Lyric Intimacy in Herbert, Whitman, and Ashbery. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Warner, Marina. 2013. Foreword. Monica Germanà & Emily Horton eds. Ali Smith. Contemporary Critical Perspectives. London-New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, vii-ix.

Weaver, Milly. 2018. Reading Words alongside Images: Ali Smith and Visual Portraiture. Interdisciplinary Literary Studies, 20, 4: 527-548.

Woolf, Virginia. 2008 [1927]. The New Biography. David Bradshaw ed. Granite and Rainbow: Essays by Virginia Woolf. London: Oxford University Press, 95-100.

Woolf, Virginia. 1928. Orlando: A Biography. London: The Hogarth Press.

Woolf, Virginia. 2007 [1929]. A Room of One’s Own. The Selected Works of Virginia Woolf. Ware (Hertfordshire): Wordsworth Library Collection, 561-634.

Keywords

androgyny, duplicity, mutual participation, reader’s engagement, reciprocity, sexual identity, visuality

DOI

10.17456/SIMPLE-214

Download

Pubblicato

28/11/2023